Comment by mulmen 4 days ago This mission is Artemis II. Is Artemis III the one with a lander? 5 comments mulmen Reply JumpCrisscross 4 days ago > Is Artemis III the one with a lander?Not anymore. Artemis III is now a LEO systems check [1]. Comparable to Apollo 9.(Side note: when did we switch from Arabic to Roman numerals?)[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_III xattt 4 days ago There’s definitely “notation-fluidity” in Apollo mission patches. 10 is Roman, 11 is Arabic, 12 & 13 are Roman again. FabHK 4 days ago Which is weird, because "X", "10", "XI", "XII", "12", "XIII", "13" are all unambiguous, while "11" could be read as "II" = 2 depending on the font. In other words, they switched exactly as to maximise ambiguity. fluidcruft 4 days ago I don't know but the rockets and missiles have done that (Saturn V, Minuteman III, etc)
JumpCrisscross 4 days ago > Is Artemis III the one with a lander?Not anymore. Artemis III is now a LEO systems check [1]. Comparable to Apollo 9.(Side note: when did we switch from Arabic to Roman numerals?)[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_III xattt 4 days ago There’s definitely “notation-fluidity” in Apollo mission patches. 10 is Roman, 11 is Arabic, 12 & 13 are Roman again. FabHK 4 days ago Which is weird, because "X", "10", "XI", "XII", "12", "XIII", "13" are all unambiguous, while "11" could be read as "II" = 2 depending on the font. In other words, they switched exactly as to maximise ambiguity. fluidcruft 4 days ago I don't know but the rockets and missiles have done that (Saturn V, Minuteman III, etc)
xattt 4 days ago There’s definitely “notation-fluidity” in Apollo mission patches. 10 is Roman, 11 is Arabic, 12 & 13 are Roman again. FabHK 4 days ago Which is weird, because "X", "10", "XI", "XII", "12", "XIII", "13" are all unambiguous, while "11" could be read as "II" = 2 depending on the font. In other words, they switched exactly as to maximise ambiguity.
FabHK 4 days ago Which is weird, because "X", "10", "XI", "XII", "12", "XIII", "13" are all unambiguous, while "11" could be read as "II" = 2 depending on the font. In other words, they switched exactly as to maximise ambiguity.
fluidcruft 4 days ago I don't know but the rockets and missiles have done that (Saturn V, Minuteman III, etc)
> Is Artemis III the one with a lander?
Not anymore. Artemis III is now a LEO systems check [1]. Comparable to Apollo 9.
(Side note: when did we switch from Arabic to Roman numerals?)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_III
There’s definitely “notation-fluidity” in Apollo mission patches. 10 is Roman, 11 is Arabic, 12 & 13 are Roman again.
Which is weird, because "X", "10", "XI", "XII", "12", "XIII", "13" are all unambiguous, while "11" could be read as "II" = 2 depending on the font. In other words, they switched exactly as to maximise ambiguity.
I don't know but the rockets and missiles have done that (Saturn V, Minuteman III, etc)