Comment by satvikpendem

3 days ago

Why "should" they? There's no reason they would especially when their competitor now owns OpenClaw.

Because a big part of Anthropic's story is that they build based on how people actually use AI. Power users aren't just annoying edge cases, they're signal. Throttling them and calling it done is inconsistent with that.

  • > Power users aren't just annoying edge cases, they're signal.

    You got that right; in this case they are signalling that AI token providers are not going to be able to run at a profit anytime soon.

    Not sure if that helps or hurts your argument, though.

  • > Power users aren't just annoying edge cases, they're signal.

    Not all power users. Some re-invent the wheel and/or do things inefficiently, and in most cases there's no business incentive to adapt the service to fit the usage patterns of those users, or of other users that deviate from the norm in regards to resource usage.

  • Sorry to tell you but generally any company's "story" is all marketing and PR, if it interferes with their making money, which it does in this case, that company will not hesitate to leave it behind.

  • Oh the billion bollar vc backed pre ipo companys story was this? Omg and they somehow are not delivering up to your standards? Damn they better get their act together lest people like you will whine on twitter about them losing their way

> Why "should" they?

Because it is clear that there is a market demand for it.

  • There is also a clear market demand for $10 bills sold for $5, but I don't see you tapping into that opportunity!

    • I didn't write anything about pricing. I just claim that people would love an offering without the discussed restriction, and because there is clear evidence of such a demand, it would make sense for Anthropic to prepare such an offering.

      3 replies →