Comment by dangus 5 hours ago Oops I read this wrong. 5 comments dangus Reply kritiko 5 hours ago Majority is correct if you go by the $125k figure (which is skewed by public listing data, I’m sure) nixosbestos 5 hours ago Huh? 87k is the median, not mean, so majority would be perfectly accurate....? revv00 5 hours ago Even 87k is a huge number, is it due to some selection bias? dangus 5 hours ago Oops I read this wrong. detaro 5 hours ago and 87k is quite a bit below 125k.
kritiko 5 hours ago Majority is correct if you go by the $125k figure (which is skewed by public listing data, I’m sure)
nixosbestos 5 hours ago Huh? 87k is the median, not mean, so majority would be perfectly accurate....? revv00 5 hours ago Even 87k is a huge number, is it due to some selection bias? dangus 5 hours ago Oops I read this wrong. detaro 5 hours ago and 87k is quite a bit below 125k.
Majority is correct if you go by the $125k figure (which is skewed by public listing data, I’m sure)
Huh? 87k is the median, not mean, so majority would be perfectly accurate....?
Even 87k is a huge number, is it due to some selection bias?
Oops I read this wrong.
and 87k is quite a bit below 125k.