← Back to context Comment by dangus 11 hours ago Oops I read this wrong. 5 comments dangus Reply kritiko 11 hours ago Majority is correct if you go by the $125k figure (which is skewed by public listing data, I’m sure) nixosbestos 11 hours ago Huh? 87k is the median, not mean, so majority would be perfectly accurate....? revv00 11 hours ago Even 87k is a huge number, is it due to some selection bias? dangus 11 hours ago Oops I read this wrong. detaro 11 hours ago and 87k is quite a bit below 125k.
kritiko 11 hours ago Majority is correct if you go by the $125k figure (which is skewed by public listing data, I’m sure)
nixosbestos 11 hours ago Huh? 87k is the median, not mean, so majority would be perfectly accurate....? revv00 11 hours ago Even 87k is a huge number, is it due to some selection bias? dangus 11 hours ago Oops I read this wrong. detaro 11 hours ago and 87k is quite a bit below 125k.
Majority is correct if you go by the $125k figure (which is skewed by public listing data, I’m sure)
Huh? 87k is the median, not mean, so majority would be perfectly accurate....?
Even 87k is a huge number, is it due to some selection bias?
Oops I read this wrong.
and 87k is quite a bit below 125k.