Comment by mohamedkoubaa 4 months ago The answer is no, he can't be trusted 4 comments mohamedkoubaa Reply pdonis 4 months ago Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working. Wyverald 4 months ago God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect. pdonis 4 months ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread. mohamedkoubaa 4 months ago Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable
pdonis 4 months ago Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working. Wyverald 4 months ago God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect. pdonis 4 months ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread. mohamedkoubaa 4 months ago Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable
Wyverald 4 months ago God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect. pdonis 4 months ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
pdonis 4 months ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working.
God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...
Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.
> I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.
Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable