← Back to context Comment by mohamedkoubaa 6 hours ago The answer is no, he can't be trusted 4 comments mohamedkoubaa Reply pdonis 6 hours ago Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working. mohamedkoubaa 4 hours ago Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable Wyverald 4 hours ago God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect. pdonis 2 hours ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
pdonis 6 hours ago Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working. mohamedkoubaa 4 hours ago Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable Wyverald 4 hours ago God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect. pdonis 2 hours ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
Wyverald 4 hours ago God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect. pdonis 2 hours ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
pdonis 2 hours ago > I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.
Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working.
Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable
God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...
Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.
> I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.
Evidently we disagree. I responded about that to another commenter downthread.