Comment by moi2388
13 hours ago
If you’re a doctor? You have not killed the person, you let them die in peace, if you want to continue the reductio ad absurdum?
Or if you put CO2 in the atmosphere you are contributing to toxicity and global warming?
We don’t know which infrastructure he wants to attack, and even if people do die, that is still not genocide.
Genocide is very clear intent to destroy a people.
Destroying infrastructure, or any war, is serious enough as is, we don’t need to fake arguments here.
> We don’t know which infrastructure he wants to attack
I think you may be living under a rock. He has announced multiple times that he wants to go after oil processing, power plants, desalination plants, and bridges. His threat for today's deadline (made last week) is to destroy every power plant and bridge in the country.
You are the only one making fake arguments. The threat was explicitly to destroy 'a civilization', which nobody but yourself considers equivalent to 'infrastructure'. Ply your lame rhetorical fallacies elsewhere.
> we don’t need to fake arguments here
Indeed we don't. So why make them?
> Genocide is very clear intent to destroy a people.
"a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again."
where is the intent ambiguous to you? are you just one of those that says Trump blusters big to force negotiations? otherwise, he's quite clearly said the he wants to eliminate "a whole civilization" which is exactly what genocide is. not really sure how you can be confused on this other than willingly so