Comment by SubiculumCode 1 day ago Anthropic has behaved the least like this of the AI companies. 18 comments SubiculumCode Reply Gigachad 1 day ago They made a claim that 100% of code would be AI generated in a year, over a year ago. SubiculumCode 1 day ago That was a prediction. It was not a claim of their current capabilities. If that is the one you reach for then I feel my point has been made. SpicyLemonZest 1 day ago They were right, it's hit 100% at a number of large tech companies. (They missed their initial prediction of 90% 6 months ago, because the models then available publicly weren't capable enough.) skejeke 1 day ago So why aren’t they laying people off and pumping the extra money towards research efforts associated with Llm’s? Lmao.They should all cut down their labour input right now if what you claim is true. 4 replies → hn_acc1 1 day ago Please tell me those companies so I can find alternatives. I'm using AI every day and there's no way I would trust it do that. 9 replies →
Gigachad 1 day ago They made a claim that 100% of code would be AI generated in a year, over a year ago. SubiculumCode 1 day ago That was a prediction. It was not a claim of their current capabilities. If that is the one you reach for then I feel my point has been made. SpicyLemonZest 1 day ago They were right, it's hit 100% at a number of large tech companies. (They missed their initial prediction of 90% 6 months ago, because the models then available publicly weren't capable enough.) skejeke 1 day ago So why aren’t they laying people off and pumping the extra money towards research efforts associated with Llm’s? Lmao.They should all cut down their labour input right now if what you claim is true. 4 replies → hn_acc1 1 day ago Please tell me those companies so I can find alternatives. I'm using AI every day and there's no way I would trust it do that. 9 replies →
SubiculumCode 1 day ago That was a prediction. It was not a claim of their current capabilities. If that is the one you reach for then I feel my point has been made.
SpicyLemonZest 1 day ago They were right, it's hit 100% at a number of large tech companies. (They missed their initial prediction of 90% 6 months ago, because the models then available publicly weren't capable enough.) skejeke 1 day ago So why aren’t they laying people off and pumping the extra money towards research efforts associated with Llm’s? Lmao.They should all cut down their labour input right now if what you claim is true. 4 replies → hn_acc1 1 day ago Please tell me those companies so I can find alternatives. I'm using AI every day and there's no way I would trust it do that. 9 replies →
skejeke 1 day ago So why aren’t they laying people off and pumping the extra money towards research efforts associated with Llm’s? Lmao.They should all cut down their labour input right now if what you claim is true. 4 replies →
hn_acc1 1 day ago Please tell me those companies so I can find alternatives. I'm using AI every day and there's no way I would trust it do that. 9 replies →
They made a claim that 100% of code would be AI generated in a year, over a year ago.
That was a prediction. It was not a claim of their current capabilities. If that is the one you reach for then I feel my point has been made.
They were right, it's hit 100% at a number of large tech companies. (They missed their initial prediction of 90% 6 months ago, because the models then available publicly weren't capable enough.)
So why aren’t they laying people off and pumping the extra money towards research efforts associated with Llm’s? Lmao.
They should all cut down their labour input right now if what you claim is true.
4 replies →
Please tell me those companies so I can find alternatives. I'm using AI every day and there's no way I would trust it do that.
9 replies →