Comment by Krssst

18 hours ago

Less oil on the market meaning higher fuel prices with the US being a net exporter.

Not sure that was the plan but it looks like a benefit.

> looks like a benefit

To who? I don't think the people paying half again as much at the pump feel like it benefited them.

  • > I don't think the people paying half again as much at the pump feel like it benefited them.

    Since when has the current US government done anything to benefit average citizens?

    The war in Iran helps those who actually matter -- the oil companies that spent 445 million dollars getting Trump and other Republicans elected in 2024.

  • [flagged]

    • > I cant even talk without insults when it comes to you, and so does everybody I know.

      That sounds awful. Touch grass, perhaps? Even MAGA does not talk about me that way.

      > microscopic shrivelled balls

      I would like to think HN participants were better than this type of rhetoric. But I see your account is fairly new, so maybe things are changing.

      2 replies →

Giving the oil companies, some of the richest companies on the planet, MORE money is a benefit? Is that your idea of good governance? You don't think there's better uses of that money that's coming right out of your pocket and everybody elses?

  • That's absolutely not my idea of good governance, playing with oil prices is extremely dangerous considering that economy is strongly tied to them. Starting a useless war is crazy in the first place.

    But it is more money in America (for the government / oil producers to misuse) which is a benefit from the standpoint of the government. Not sure it exceeds the losses though.

  • It is a benefit if you're a stakeholder in those companies, or your friends are stakeholders and will pass on some of the winnings as a "thank you."