Comment by CharlieDigital 13 hours ago It is a strongly-typed query generator? 5 comments CharlieDigital Reply gib444 12 hours ago I meant code generators like sqlc CharlieDigital 12 hours ago Then this goes back to your question: > Is it good at the wrong thing? No, it's good at the right thing which is allowing developers to write type-safe SQL queries using C# at the application layer versus writing SQL that gets translated into C#. mattgreenrocks 11 hours ago Yep, up there with ActiveRecord as the finest ORM I’ve ever used. What seals it for me is the low coupling it imposes on entities. gib444 10 hours ago I don't think you were aware of code gen SQL tools before this conversation right 1 reply →
gib444 12 hours ago I meant code generators like sqlc CharlieDigital 12 hours ago Then this goes back to your question: > Is it good at the wrong thing? No, it's good at the right thing which is allowing developers to write type-safe SQL queries using C# at the application layer versus writing SQL that gets translated into C#. mattgreenrocks 11 hours ago Yep, up there with ActiveRecord as the finest ORM I’ve ever used. What seals it for me is the low coupling it imposes on entities. gib444 10 hours ago I don't think you were aware of code gen SQL tools before this conversation right 1 reply →
CharlieDigital 12 hours ago Then this goes back to your question: > Is it good at the wrong thing? No, it's good at the right thing which is allowing developers to write type-safe SQL queries using C# at the application layer versus writing SQL that gets translated into C#. mattgreenrocks 11 hours ago Yep, up there with ActiveRecord as the finest ORM I’ve ever used. What seals it for me is the low coupling it imposes on entities. gib444 10 hours ago I don't think you were aware of code gen SQL tools before this conversation right 1 reply →
mattgreenrocks 11 hours ago Yep, up there with ActiveRecord as the finest ORM I’ve ever used. What seals it for me is the low coupling it imposes on entities.
gib444 10 hours ago I don't think you were aware of code gen SQL tools before this conversation right 1 reply →
I meant code generators like sqlc
Then this goes back to your question:
No, it's good at the right thing which is allowing developers to write type-safe SQL queries using C# at the application layer versus writing SQL that gets translated into C#.
Yep, up there with ActiveRecord as the finest ORM I’ve ever used. What seals it for me is the low coupling it imposes on entities.
I don't think you were aware of code gen SQL tools before this conversation right
1 reply →