This is a bizarre comment. What level of absence of evidence would you accept to prove "not corrupt enough?" The "corruption snack" language strongly suggests you aren't really interested in changing your mind even if such evidence could be provided.
This is a bizarre comment. What level of absence of evidence would you accept to prove "not corrupt enough?" The "corruption snack" language strongly suggests you aren't really interested in changing your mind even if such evidence could be provided.
If you know of one I would gladly hold it up as a shining example and a template for others to follow. And yet...
It's also bizarre because light timings are set by DOTs, not police departments...
Do you think your local DOT is corrupt? I think mine is inept, but not corrupt.
welcome to hn