Comment by jjgreen 10 hours ago [flagged] 4 comments jjgreen Reply Bjartr 10 hours ago If you'd just left off "to fuck" you'd end up way less downvoted, if it even happened at all. jjgreen 10 hours ago With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see. KPGv2 10 hours ago [flagged] jvanderbot 10 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
Bjartr 10 hours ago If you'd just left off "to fuck" you'd end up way less downvoted, if it even happened at all. jjgreen 10 hours ago With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see. KPGv2 10 hours ago [flagged] jvanderbot 10 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
jjgreen 10 hours ago With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see.
KPGv2 10 hours ago [flagged] jvanderbot 10 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
jvanderbot 10 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
If you'd just left off "to fuck" you'd end up way less downvoted, if it even happened at all.
With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see.
[flagged]
Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.
Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.