← Back to context Comment by jjgreen 9 hours ago [flagged] 4 comments jjgreen Reply Bjartr 9 hours ago If you'd just left off "to fuck" you'd end up way less downvoted, if it even happened at all. jjgreen 8 hours ago With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see. KPGv2 8 hours ago [flagged] jvanderbot 8 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
Bjartr 9 hours ago If you'd just left off "to fuck" you'd end up way less downvoted, if it even happened at all. jjgreen 8 hours ago With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see. KPGv2 8 hours ago [flagged] jvanderbot 8 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
jjgreen 8 hours ago With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see.
KPGv2 8 hours ago [flagged] jvanderbot 8 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
jvanderbot 8 hours ago Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.
If you'd just left off "to fuck" you'd end up way less downvoted, if it even happened at all.
With fucks, without fucks, in iambic pentameter, anything vaguely critical of Rust will be downvoted. As you can see.
[flagged]
Knowing the reason something is considered bad does not immediately change that fact that it is considered bad.
Social / emotional signals still exist around that word.