Comment by koshergweilo
9 hours ago
You clearly didn't read the article closely enough. The first header is "The Numbers Aren’t Working Out." If it was about the audience, they would have switched stopped earlier.
9 hours ago
You clearly didn't read the article closely enough. The first header is "The Numbers Aren’t Working Out." If it was about the audience, they would have switched stopped earlier.
Those numbers are the real news here - that's a brutal drop in traffic. Are other organisations seeing the same?
[dead]
[dead]
[flagged]
I agree with you. It's clear that they're leaving X because "X bad", but they don't want to say it that way. I don't know if X is or isn't bad, but it seems pretty mainstream and a good representation of a lot of society, both US and international, so for an org that apparently cares for the online rights of people, it feels silly to leave a platform where there are - people. (and this is coming from someone who doesn't use X or social media in general)
It is a poor representation of society internationally. Twitter has never been a big platform outside the US (and Japan I believe). It's irrelevant most other places.
[flagged]
I'm not gonna make this about good vs bad, just gonna say EFF is telling us they endorse the Democratic party, a bit like the ACLU. If that's the message they want to send, that's fine.