Comment by saghm 7 days ago He was not the founder of OpenAI 3 comments saghm Reply estearum 7 days ago nobody was "the" founder of OpenAI. Sam was one of many cofounders, though I don't see how the particulars here are relevant to the point above. saghm 6 days ago There are several points above:> wasn't OpenAI the company that was formed as a nonprofit to limit the risks of LLMs?>> the whole “rationalist” movement is full of those lying fks>>> Is Sam even a rationalist, or describe his views as rationalist?The relevancy is that a question of how and why the company was formed isn't fully answered by only talking about his motivations. estearum 6 days ago I see I see. Makes sense!
estearum 7 days ago nobody was "the" founder of OpenAI. Sam was one of many cofounders, though I don't see how the particulars here are relevant to the point above. saghm 6 days ago There are several points above:> wasn't OpenAI the company that was formed as a nonprofit to limit the risks of LLMs?>> the whole “rationalist” movement is full of those lying fks>>> Is Sam even a rationalist, or describe his views as rationalist?The relevancy is that a question of how and why the company was formed isn't fully answered by only talking about his motivations. estearum 6 days ago I see I see. Makes sense!
saghm 6 days ago There are several points above:> wasn't OpenAI the company that was formed as a nonprofit to limit the risks of LLMs?>> the whole “rationalist” movement is full of those lying fks>>> Is Sam even a rationalist, or describe his views as rationalist?The relevancy is that a question of how and why the company was formed isn't fully answered by only talking about his motivations. estearum 6 days ago I see I see. Makes sense!
nobody was "the" founder of OpenAI. Sam was one of many cofounders, though I don't see how the particulars here are relevant to the point above.
There are several points above:
> wasn't OpenAI the company that was formed as a nonprofit to limit the risks of LLMs?
>> the whole “rationalist” movement is full of those lying fks
>>> Is Sam even a rationalist, or describe his views as rationalist?
The relevancy is that a question of how and why the company was formed isn't fully answered by only talking about his motivations.
I see I see. Makes sense!