Comment by direwolf20 7 hours ago Or SSPL, which extends AGPL with even more sharing requirements. 2 comments direwolf20 Reply aleph_minus_one 5 hours ago The SSPL is not an open-source license. cxr 3 hours ago > It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...>
aleph_minus_one 5 hours ago The SSPL is not an open-source license. cxr 3 hours ago > It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...>
cxr 3 hours ago > It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...>
The SSPL is not an open-source license.
> It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.
From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...>