← Back to context Comment by direwolf20 2 days ago Or SSPL, which extends AGPL with even more sharing requirements. 4 comments direwolf20 Reply aleph_minus_one 2 days ago The SSPL is not an open-source license. cxr 2 days ago > It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...> direwolf20 1 day ago Yes it is. It plainly meets all the criteria in the definition iff AGPL meets them too. aleph_minus_one 18 hours ago The central difference is that SSPL discriminates against specific fields of endeavor, while the AGPL doesn't; see* https://web.archive.org/web/20230411163802/https://lists.ope...* https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Server_Side_Publi...
aleph_minus_one 2 days ago The SSPL is not an open-source license. cxr 2 days ago > It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...> direwolf20 1 day ago Yes it is. It plainly meets all the criteria in the definition iff AGPL meets them too. aleph_minus_one 18 hours ago The central difference is that SSPL discriminates against specific fields of endeavor, while the AGPL doesn't; see* https://web.archive.org/web/20230411163802/https://lists.ope...* https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Server_Side_Publi...
cxr 2 days ago > It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...>
direwolf20 1 day ago Yes it is. It plainly meets all the criteria in the definition iff AGPL meets them too. aleph_minus_one 18 hours ago The central difference is that SSPL discriminates against specific fields of endeavor, while the AGPL doesn't; see* https://web.archive.org/web/20230411163802/https://lists.ope...* https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Server_Side_Publi...
aleph_minus_one 18 hours ago The central difference is that SSPL discriminates against specific fields of endeavor, while the AGPL doesn't; see* https://web.archive.org/web/20230411163802/https://lists.ope...* https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Server_Side_Publi...
The SSPL is not an open-source license.
> It's deception, plain and simple, to claim that the software has all the benefits and promises of open source when it does not.
From "The SSPL is Not an Open Source License" <https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...>
Yes it is. It plainly meets all the criteria in the definition iff AGPL meets them too.
The central difference is that SSPL discriminates against specific fields of endeavor, while the AGPL doesn't; see
* https://web.archive.org/web/20230411163802/https://lists.ope...
* https://opensource.org/blog/the-sspl-is-not-an-open-source-l...
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Server_Side_Publi...