Comment by senordevnyc 5 days ago This waters down the definition of political leader to the point of absurdity. 2 comments senordevnyc Reply AlexeyBelov 5 days ago He's rich, connected at the highest levels, works with the US govt and specifically the military. Able to have a relatively high political influence (on the workforce at the very least). How is he not actively a political figure? senordevnyc 4 days ago Because words have meaning, and that’s not what political leader has ever meant?But sure, go ahead and define it however you want.
AlexeyBelov 5 days ago He's rich, connected at the highest levels, works with the US govt and specifically the military. Able to have a relatively high political influence (on the workforce at the very least). How is he not actively a political figure? senordevnyc 4 days ago Because words have meaning, and that’s not what political leader has ever meant?But sure, go ahead and define it however you want.
senordevnyc 4 days ago Because words have meaning, and that’s not what political leader has ever meant?But sure, go ahead and define it however you want.
He's rich, connected at the highest levels, works with the US govt and specifically the military. Able to have a relatively high political influence (on the workforce at the very least). How is he not actively a political figure?
Because words have meaning, and that’s not what political leader has ever meant?
But sure, go ahead and define it however you want.