Comment by Semaphor 3 hours ago AFAIK not much in most of the world, in Germany you get a letter from lawyers wanting ~1000 EUR 2 comments Semaphor Reply SturgeonsLaw 2 hours ago In Australia the court ruled that they can only sue for the cost of renting the movie, so they don't bother trying to recoup their ten bucks iamtedd 1 hour ago That's interesting. Do you have further reading? I've seen AFACT v iiNet, but that doesn't look to be the source of "cost of renting", just that the ISP isn't responsible for their users.
SturgeonsLaw 2 hours ago In Australia the court ruled that they can only sue for the cost of renting the movie, so they don't bother trying to recoup their ten bucks iamtedd 1 hour ago That's interesting. Do you have further reading? I've seen AFACT v iiNet, but that doesn't look to be the source of "cost of renting", just that the ISP isn't responsible for their users.
iamtedd 1 hour ago That's interesting. Do you have further reading? I've seen AFACT v iiNet, but that doesn't look to be the source of "cost of renting", just that the ISP isn't responsible for their users.
In Australia the court ruled that they can only sue for the cost of renting the movie, so they don't bother trying to recoup their ten bucks
That's interesting. Do you have further reading? I've seen AFACT v iiNet, but that doesn't look to be the source of "cost of renting", just that the ISP isn't responsible for their users.