Comment by codexb 20 hours ago It uses the phrase “regulate commerce between the states” which effectively has the same meaning. 5 comments codexb Reply torstenvl 19 hours ago No. It absolutely does not use that language, and it baffles me as to what would cause you to say that it does.Please endeavor to say only true things. The truth matters. bsimpson 18 hours ago You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause torstenvl 17 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
torstenvl 19 hours ago No. It absolutely does not use that language, and it baffles me as to what would cause you to say that it does.Please endeavor to say only true things. The truth matters. bsimpson 18 hours ago You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause torstenvl 17 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
bsimpson 18 hours ago You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause torstenvl 17 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
No. It absolutely does not use that language, and it baffles me as to what would cause you to say that it does.
Please endeavor to say only true things. The truth matters.
You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:
> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause
[flagged]
1 reply →