← Back to context Comment by codexb 1 day ago It uses the phrase “regulate commerce between the states” which effectively has the same meaning. 5 comments codexb Reply torstenvl 1 day ago No. It absolutely does not use that language, and it baffles me as to what would cause you to say that it does.Please endeavor to say only true things. The truth matters. bsimpson 1 day ago You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause torstenvl 1 day ago [flagged] 1 reply →
torstenvl 1 day ago No. It absolutely does not use that language, and it baffles me as to what would cause you to say that it does.Please endeavor to say only true things. The truth matters. bsimpson 1 day ago You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause torstenvl 1 day ago [flagged] 1 reply →
bsimpson 1 day ago You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause torstenvl 1 day ago [flagged] 1 reply →
No. It absolutely does not use that language, and it baffles me as to what would cause you to say that it does.
Please endeavor to say only true things. The truth matters.
You're working awfully hard to be pedantic without comparing the actual language:
> to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause
[flagged]
1 reply →