Comment by djoldman
21 hours ago
Additionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
21 hours ago
Additionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
only in a new case ....
The court is stacked with so called originalists - history stopped in the eighteenth century.
idk, they wouldn't have given the president nearly absolute immunity back then..
Yes, they are insincere "originalists". This is known.