Comment by djoldman
1 day ago
Additionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
1 day ago
Additionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
only in a new case ....
The court is stacked with so called originalists - history stopped in the eighteenth century.
idk, they wouldn't have given the president nearly absolute immunity back then..
Yes, they are insincere "originalists". This is known.