Comment by troupo

It's still an autocomplete on steroids (that's what LLMs are).

It still produces subpar code, with horrendous data access patterns, endless duplication of fucntionality etc. You still need a human in the loop to fix all the mistakes (unless you're Garry Tan or Steve Yegge who assume that quality is when you push hundreds of thousands of LoC per day).

Same here.

Oh, and Claude Code is significantly worse at generating design code than almost any other type of code.