Comment by theowaway213456
9 hours ago
If we're allowed to make modifications here then it should really be lose => looze and loose => luce
9 hours ago
If we're allowed to make modifications here then it should really be lose => looze and loose => luce
Fun fact — English did not have formalized spelling prior to the printing press
https://www.dictionary.com/articles/printing-press-frozen-sp...
So, technically we are allowed to make modifications! We just can't expect others to adhere to our modifications :)
Luce is already a word in English, if a little obscure
I think that would make "loosely" not work out. Lucely/lucly catch the hard C there. I'm good with loozing/loozer, looks kind of funny though.
Lucely absolutely does not catch the hard c. Surely there is no word in the English language where "ce" has a hard c, only loanwords like celt.
I would not pronounce lucely with a hard C
Lucezly
One more step, and we're in Poland.