Comment by Crestwave 4 months ago Wouldn't strings(1) have worked for this? 2 comments Crestwave Reply ksherlock 4 months ago By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed). Crestwave 4 months ago Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.
ksherlock 4 months ago By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed). Crestwave 4 months ago Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.
By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed).
Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.