← Back to context Comment by Crestwave 1 day ago Wouldn't strings(1) have worked for this? 2 comments Crestwave Reply ksherlock 1 day ago By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed). Crestwave 15 hours ago Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.
ksherlock 1 day ago By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed). Crestwave 15 hours ago Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.
By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed).
Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.