The more sensible take is “don’t use new technology where it doesn’t make sense.” The start menu should need a web browser engine and a heavy JS framework because…?
Well I don't use Windows so I can't comment on the quality. And I actually don't even really care about it. I was just commenting on the curmudgeonly perspective that young people can't do things right.
Another way to look at it: Microsoft APIs have fallen from grace. Even their own devs don't dogfood anymore. They download something that Facebook made instead and reimplement the Holy Start Menu using that.
The more sensible take is “don’t use new technology where it doesn’t make sense.” The start menu should need a web browser engine and a heavy JS framework because…?
The start menu just.... doesn't open sometimes these days.
It's a laggy resource hog. It's slow to open. You can spam the windows key and watch CPU usage increase.
Putting words in someone's mouth to defend that dreck sounds ridiculous, yes.
Well I don't use Windows so I can't comment on the quality. And I actually don't even really care about it. I was just commenting on the curmudgeonly perspective that young people can't do things right.
That new technology could be Zig or Rust, if that's the spiel.
Or it could be Ada, old and boring but generally safe.
New for the sake of new is vanity.
Another way to look at it: Microsoft APIs have fallen from grace. Even their own devs don't dogfood anymore. They download something that Facebook made instead and reimplement the Holy Start Menu using that.
Let me introduce you to a new concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Let's use new technology just because it's new.
You see how ridiculous that sounds