Comment by cosmicgadget 14 hours ago It is legal and until we vote for people who will outlaw it we only have ourselves to blame. 17 comments cosmicgadget Reply GolfPopper 13 hours ago Easy to say, hard to do, when your two "choices" at the ballot box represent slightly different groups of wealthy donors. cosmicgadget 13 hours ago Vote in primaries. Also wealthy donors probably care less about whether a candidate can self-enrich with insider trading. XorNot 13 hours ago Ah enlightened centrism rears its head again. Remember folks: at all points both sides are exactly the same /s. singingtoday 13 hours ago If you guilt me into voting, I'll probably vote for somebody you don't like.Isn't it better that I don't vote? 5 replies → yieldcrv 10 hours ago Everyone knows how the parties are differentIts valid to be more annoyed by the ways that they’re the sameyour cause is not my cause, its better for the viability of your preferred party if you remember that 5 replies → hibberl6 10 hours ago [dead] hibberl6 10 hours ago [flagged]
GolfPopper 13 hours ago Easy to say, hard to do, when your two "choices" at the ballot box represent slightly different groups of wealthy donors. cosmicgadget 13 hours ago Vote in primaries. Also wealthy donors probably care less about whether a candidate can self-enrich with insider trading. XorNot 13 hours ago Ah enlightened centrism rears its head again. Remember folks: at all points both sides are exactly the same /s. singingtoday 13 hours ago If you guilt me into voting, I'll probably vote for somebody you don't like.Isn't it better that I don't vote? 5 replies → yieldcrv 10 hours ago Everyone knows how the parties are differentIts valid to be more annoyed by the ways that they’re the sameyour cause is not my cause, its better for the viability of your preferred party if you remember that 5 replies → hibberl6 10 hours ago [dead] hibberl6 10 hours ago [flagged]
cosmicgadget 13 hours ago Vote in primaries. Also wealthy donors probably care less about whether a candidate can self-enrich with insider trading.
XorNot 13 hours ago Ah enlightened centrism rears its head again. Remember folks: at all points both sides are exactly the same /s. singingtoday 13 hours ago If you guilt me into voting, I'll probably vote for somebody you don't like.Isn't it better that I don't vote? 5 replies → yieldcrv 10 hours ago Everyone knows how the parties are differentIts valid to be more annoyed by the ways that they’re the sameyour cause is not my cause, its better for the viability of your preferred party if you remember that 5 replies → hibberl6 10 hours ago [dead]
singingtoday 13 hours ago If you guilt me into voting, I'll probably vote for somebody you don't like.Isn't it better that I don't vote? 5 replies →
yieldcrv 10 hours ago Everyone knows how the parties are differentIts valid to be more annoyed by the ways that they’re the sameyour cause is not my cause, its better for the viability of your preferred party if you remember that 5 replies →
Easy to say, hard to do, when your two "choices" at the ballot box represent slightly different groups of wealthy donors.
Vote in primaries. Also wealthy donors probably care less about whether a candidate can self-enrich with insider trading.
Ah enlightened centrism rears its head again. Remember folks: at all points both sides are exactly the same /s.
If you guilt me into voting, I'll probably vote for somebody you don't like.
Isn't it better that I don't vote?
5 replies →
Everyone knows how the parties are different
Its valid to be more annoyed by the ways that they’re the same
your cause is not my cause, its better for the viability of your preferred party if you remember that
5 replies →
[dead]
[flagged]