Comment by triage8004 9 hours ago It's not legal for him, but it is for them. 3 comments triage8004 Reply nandomrumber 8 hours ago That’s not it.It’s that there isn’t an Attorney General who would dare attempt raise a case against the hand that feeds them. pjio 7 hours ago In theory the separation of powers should prevent this. pjc50 6 hours ago What does separation of powers mean when both houses, the president, and the Supreme Court are controlled by the same party?At the moment the US is just Big Poland (PiS era).
nandomrumber 8 hours ago That’s not it.It’s that there isn’t an Attorney General who would dare attempt raise a case against the hand that feeds them. pjio 7 hours ago In theory the separation of powers should prevent this. pjc50 6 hours ago What does separation of powers mean when both houses, the president, and the Supreme Court are controlled by the same party?At the moment the US is just Big Poland (PiS era).
pjio 7 hours ago In theory the separation of powers should prevent this. pjc50 6 hours ago What does separation of powers mean when both houses, the president, and the Supreme Court are controlled by the same party?At the moment the US is just Big Poland (PiS era).
pjc50 6 hours ago What does separation of powers mean when both houses, the president, and the Supreme Court are controlled by the same party?At the moment the US is just Big Poland (PiS era).
That’s not it.
It’s that there isn’t an Attorney General who would dare attempt raise a case against the hand that feeds them.
In theory the separation of powers should prevent this.
What does separation of powers mean when both houses, the president, and the Supreme Court are controlled by the same party?
At the moment the US is just Big Poland (PiS era).