Comment by spindump8930

20 hours ago

Hopefully this money means more compute infrastructure to help Anthropic counter the efficiency changes that have created this perceived downtrend in claude quality.

The puzzling thing is why Google would try to help with that. Aren't they competitors? Wouldn't they want their competitor to have problems?

It's more understanding for Amazon or Microsoft to make such an investment, because they're not as competitive in the model space.

  • There's always three:

       Google buys Anthropic.
       Microsoft buys Open AI (or vice versa depending on how things go).
       SpaceGrok buys Cursor, limps along in 3rd place.
       Meta is the last man standing, get's stuck with Oracle, dies.
    

    And then hopefully some open source models save us from this nightmare before China commadatises everything.

    Edit: I forgot Amazon. Who knows what they will do. They're the wildcard anyway.

    • OpenAI buying Microsoft.. I honestly think I'd like to see that.

      Anything to invigorate the desktop.

      Microsoft buying OpenAI.. 10 minutes later it's rebranded Copilot.. and.. nothing much changes in the world. Oh, except all the AI improvements are around Enterprise governance.

  • Google owned 14ish percent of Anthropic before this investment, so presumably this could bring it up to as much as 25%?

  • What if Google can't compete? They don't want to be left behind and all this money being throw around is just nonsense anyway.

  • Google was already an investor in Anthropic but I don’t think they are truly competitors in this space.

> the efficiency changes that have created this perceived downtrend in claude quality”

Why the euphemism? What Anthropic did was an aggressive degradation of their model to save compute, and it's not just “perceived downtrend”, Anthropic themselves have acknowledged the quality of service degradation.