Comment by latexr

6 hours ago

Their use of “QR Code” is mighty confusing. QR (Quick Response) Codes are something specific that people are familiar with. These don’t share any characteristics apart from being images which represent something else. They’re not even the same colour or shape. Just call them “knot codes” or something.

I think the comparison for the lay person is just fine. The author quoted the term and explains themselves.

A QR codes encode data to be scanned and converted for the convenience of the user.

These knot graphics encode data to be scanned and converted for the convenience of the user.

  • > data to be scanned and converted

    These appear to be write-only. Where have they documented the method of scanning and conversion? Is it patented?

    The publication on arxiv only mentions visual inspection, in the context of being a bad idea.

I mean... There is a 1-1 mapping, and they look kinda like QR codes. so technically, you can make an app that scan it and it will show you the corresponding polynomial.. It could even be useful for fast checking knots

  • > they look kinda like QR codes

    Hexagonal, with shaded colors? QR Codes are, by definition, square and binary and traditionally use black and white. They're also used for a different purpose typically. They could easily have made them look more like QR Codes if they had wanted to, but they made their own artistic choices. Which I love btw, but they could have maybe chosen better wording. Something like 'fingerprint' or 'mugshot' would have conveyed the idea of it being useful for identification, if not perfect, much better.

  • > There is a 1-1 mapping

    It is strong, but not 1 to 1:

    > Tubbenhauer computed, for instance, that the invariant uniquely identifies more than 97% of the knots with 18 crossings.

    • Since they said "the corresponding polynomial", they must mean the mapping between the colored hexagons and the knot polynomials.

  • > mapping

    Which I not only mentioned in my comment, it is not even slightly unique to QR codes.

    > they look kinda like QR codes

    In what way? QR Codes are black and white, square, and asymmetrical. These are colourful, hexagonal, and symmetrical. By that token, a 16th century tile also “looks kinda like a QR Code”.

    I very much doubt you could show one of these to someone, ask them what they are, and that they would answer “QR Code”. They don’t look alike at all.