Comment by grandimam

I agree with some of reasonings in the article especially around agents write behaviors. However, a large portion of this is a consequence of poorly-defined agent roles, and moving away from building deterministic systems.

> An agent working on a customer analytics task might issue a join across five tables that has never been issued before, hold the connection while it thinks about the result, then issue a completely different follow-up.

Aren't agents simply automated human persona's? Like, why would an Agent make a join across five tables given that its reasoning is grounded on human-aligned decisions. For eg.

If the agent knows the schema, and is aware of the indexes defined. Then, shouldn't it only work its way through those 'known paths'. Why would you allow the agents to deviate known paths?