Comment by Barbing 14 days ago Maybe they researched customers’ backgrounds and only screwed the ones they thought wouldn’t lawyer up 4 comments Barbing Reply freeopinion 14 days ago This doesn't require research. Just reject by default and concede if a lawyer shows up. It doesn't cost any money to have a default denial policy and saves millions. m463 14 days ago works for health care providers. deny then let the survivors sue. franktankbank 14 days ago Same case goes to the same court too many times and you are gonna raise eyebrows. rtkwe 14 days ago They broadly decline it for BS reasons betting that most people don't know it's illegal and/or won't try to force them to follow the law.
freeopinion 14 days ago This doesn't require research. Just reject by default and concede if a lawyer shows up. It doesn't cost any money to have a default denial policy and saves millions. m463 14 days ago works for health care providers. deny then let the survivors sue. franktankbank 14 days ago Same case goes to the same court too many times and you are gonna raise eyebrows.
franktankbank 14 days ago Same case goes to the same court too many times and you are gonna raise eyebrows.
rtkwe 14 days ago They broadly decline it for BS reasons betting that most people don't know it's illegal and/or won't try to force them to follow the law.
This doesn't require research. Just reject by default and concede if a lawyer shows up. It doesn't cost any money to have a default denial policy and saves millions.
works for health care providers. deny then let the survivors sue.
Same case goes to the same court too many times and you are gonna raise eyebrows.
They broadly decline it for BS reasons betting that most people don't know it's illegal and/or won't try to force them to follow the law.