← Back to context

Comment by tasuki

10 hours ago

The article makes no mention of "personal" nor "business". Why not mention that it's talking about business websites? The original author made a (wrong) blanket statement, and monokai called them out on it.

The article doesn't need to make explicit mention of it because it's implied in the article's content:

> The website isn't for the founder, the marketing manager, or the board. It's for the person you've never met - the customer weighing up a purchase, the lead chasing a phone number, the visitor sizing up your credibility or the member signing up to access gated content.

Which personal website has a "founder, the marketing manager, or the board" much less a "customer weighing up a purchase?"

Not everything is always spelled out.