Comment by sixo

2 days ago

Missed opportunity to name an LLM "Jeeves" and finally live up to the vision.

One of the best improvements to my life was adding the following to my LLM Prompt: "Please respond as Jeeves from the P.G. Wodehouse stories".

Not only are the LLMs quite excellent at emulating the valet, the actual dynamic fits fascinatingly well. Jeeves was always both perspicacious and enthusiastic about whatever task he was given - be it ironing a shirt or seeing to Bertie's continued wellbeing.

  • > the actual dynamic fits fascinatingly well.

    This is such a good pairing! Part of the fun of the stories is that its never clear whether Jeeves' suggestions are genuis, or overconfident but insane japes, I feel like this dynamic puts LLM hallucinations into a role where they're just part of the fun.

  • I’m building a private chatbot for myself so as not to be tripped every time Claude has an ”update”, andthis was one of the first things I implemented. With very strict system prompt of no sycophancy and calling me Sir, it works really well.

  • Has anyone tried Marvin from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy? "Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they ask me these silly questions." Could be fun.

  • I use Marvin from the Star Force space opera book series. He loves sensors and information, and adds a level of challenge to counters the llm obsession with answering in over happy terms. I had Claude write me a character bible that I can include in projects to keep it consistent.

  • This is a genius idea and I’m going to shamelessly steal it!

    Thanks for sharing.

  • If anyone hasn't seen the Jeeves and Wooster series with Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry they're missing out

  • Ask it for advice on learning to play the banjo...

    Edit: ...or was it the ukulele?

I think about six months ago I commented on an AI thread to the effect of “I’m happy that after a 30 year effort and hundreds of billions spent, AskJeeves finally works as intended” - Jeeves is totally ripe for LLMing.

Completely baffling that after keeping ask.com going for this entire time (some two and a half decades of irrelevance) they shut it down at the point at which it can actually be made to work.

There was a period in the early 2000s where AskJeeves’ answer to the question “what is the meaning of life?” was an old Eliezer Yudkowsky essay saying that because we weren’t smart enough to work out the meaning of life ourselves, our highest purpose was to build smarter AIs who might be able to answer definitively. Time to close the loop!

It might be more correct to name the LLM Ask Gussie Fink-Nottle.

"Oh, dash it! I didn't mean to delete your project, I've been in such a dreadful funk today. So sorry."

  • I'm loving the Wodehouse references in this thread.

    In case there are folks unaware of it, there is an excellent TV series called "Jeeves and Wooster" (Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie) -- highly recommended!

You have no idea how correct you are…

Ask Jeeves launched in 1997 as a natural language query model!

and until about 2000…some people preferred it!

Edit: and after that its indexing and results were clowned ruthlessly,

but that doesn’t change what I’m saying!

It's a name best saved for an embodied humanobot that can do laundry, etc., too, as well as answer questions, screen calls, etc.

I have felt the same way about defunct search engine HotBot

  • I'm not sure that LLM responses would be much improved by being rendered in eye-searing combinations of chartreuse and magenta...

Not doing business with a 3 letter domain is insane. You’d probably make $10k a month just parking ads on ask.com.

You’re absolutely right: toss up an AI chat with some ads in a sidebar using an open source model and call it a day.

Two years ago I made a rudimentary chatbot/agent for our long running IRC channel using the OpenAI API as the "brain". Its nickname is Jeeves.