Comment by TeMPOraL 16 hours ago In which case the market is working as intended. 6 comments TeMPOraL Reply Dylan16807 13 hours ago If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough. mhb 4 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention. ezfe 16 hours ago Is someone saying otherwise here? natpalmer1776 14 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. Filligree 9 hours ago Yes, but isn’t that working as intended? 1 reply →
Dylan16807 13 hours ago If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough. mhb 4 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention.
mhb 4 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention.
ezfe 16 hours ago Is someone saying otherwise here? natpalmer1776 14 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. Filligree 9 hours ago Yes, but isn’t that working as intended? 1 reply →
natpalmer1776 14 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. Filligree 9 hours ago Yes, but isn’t that working as intended? 1 reply →
If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough.
Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention.
Is someone saying otherwise here?
YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions.
Yes, but isn’t that working as intended?
1 reply →