Comment by Brian_K_White 9 hours ago It's not absurdist. It's shining a light on something that actually exists and is absurd. 9 comments Brian_K_White Reply bluegatty 8 hours ago It only 'shines light' on the mental disposition of the author. stevenlangbroek 8 hours ago hi, author here. what mental disposition would that be? bluegatty 8 hours ago Whatever your mental disposition is.The writing is an expression of a state of mind through an absurdist voice, not any kind of reasonable articulation of reality. It's at least a much about the lens as it is the subject. Which is fine, if we ingest it roughly from that purview. 6 replies →
bluegatty 8 hours ago It only 'shines light' on the mental disposition of the author. stevenlangbroek 8 hours ago hi, author here. what mental disposition would that be? bluegatty 8 hours ago Whatever your mental disposition is.The writing is an expression of a state of mind through an absurdist voice, not any kind of reasonable articulation of reality. It's at least a much about the lens as it is the subject. Which is fine, if we ingest it roughly from that purview. 6 replies →
stevenlangbroek 8 hours ago hi, author here. what mental disposition would that be? bluegatty 8 hours ago Whatever your mental disposition is.The writing is an expression of a state of mind through an absurdist voice, not any kind of reasonable articulation of reality. It's at least a much about the lens as it is the subject. Which is fine, if we ingest it roughly from that purview. 6 replies →
bluegatty 8 hours ago Whatever your mental disposition is.The writing is an expression of a state of mind through an absurdist voice, not any kind of reasonable articulation of reality. It's at least a much about the lens as it is the subject. Which is fine, if we ingest it roughly from that purview. 6 replies →
It only 'shines light' on the mental disposition of the author.
hi, author here. what mental disposition would that be?
Whatever your mental disposition is.
The writing is an expression of a state of mind through an absurdist voice, not any kind of reasonable articulation of reality. It's at least a much about the lens as it is the subject. Which is fine, if we ingest it roughly from that purview.
6 replies →