Comment by gpderetta 11 days ago VisualRust 7 comments gpderetta Reply willglynn 10 days ago Glorious: https://seri.tools/blog/announcing-rust9x/ mvx64 10 days ago Works amazingly well: https://bsky.app/profile/mentalvertex.bsky.social/post/3lzvb... neonstatic 9 days ago > Y2k compliant!That's a load off my mind wojtczyk 10 days ago One of the best Windows 95 projects wojtczyk 11 days ago haha - someone should do it tosti 10 days ago Nowadays it would be called VisualRust365 with CoPilot. And suck. wojtczyk 10 days ago But we can make a Windows NT 3.51 version of Visual Rust, that doesn't suck.
willglynn 10 days ago Glorious: https://seri.tools/blog/announcing-rust9x/ mvx64 10 days ago Works amazingly well: https://bsky.app/profile/mentalvertex.bsky.social/post/3lzvb... neonstatic 9 days ago > Y2k compliant!That's a load off my mind wojtczyk 10 days ago One of the best Windows 95 projects
mvx64 10 days ago Works amazingly well: https://bsky.app/profile/mentalvertex.bsky.social/post/3lzvb...
wojtczyk 11 days ago haha - someone should do it tosti 10 days ago Nowadays it would be called VisualRust365 with CoPilot. And suck. wojtczyk 10 days ago But we can make a Windows NT 3.51 version of Visual Rust, that doesn't suck.
tosti 10 days ago Nowadays it would be called VisualRust365 with CoPilot. And suck. wojtczyk 10 days ago But we can make a Windows NT 3.51 version of Visual Rust, that doesn't suck.
Glorious: https://seri.tools/blog/announcing-rust9x/
Works amazingly well: https://bsky.app/profile/mentalvertex.bsky.social/post/3lzvb...
> Y2k compliant!
That's a load off my mind
One of the best Windows 95 projects
haha - someone should do it
Nowadays it would be called VisualRust365 with CoPilot. And suck.
But we can make a Windows NT 3.51 version of Visual Rust, that doesn't suck.