Comment by delfinom

Wow, way to argue maliciously.

The only reason any AI usage is rejected in this scenario is due to errors.

Human error is one thing, but if a human uses AI and does not verify its output and then publishes it as some sort of authoritative work, you are pushing deep past ethical issues and often into legal issues.

Government word is law so government employees posting bad information from AI when it's their job to post good information is practically a crime in of itself.

Yes, humans can also publish information by mistake, but there's a massive difference between a human getting some numbers wrong vs. AI completely inventing citations.

My megacorp recently published their first AI usage policy, more or less, go nuts using AI but you will be 100% be held accountable for reviewing output to be acceptable, including but not limited to terminations.