Comment by elija
11 hours ago
In some sense, I wonder if non-open-source is "safer" since LLMs can't mass scan the code for exploits.
11 hours ago
In some sense, I wonder if non-open-source is "safer" since LLMs can't mass scan the code for exploits.
Maybe for a while, but there's nothing stopping LLMs from examining disassembler output.
Security through obscurity
If they don't get scanned, then they also don't get fixed, so if they have the same amount of holes, they will stay vulnerable for longer.