Comment by hawkice
8 days ago
I think some comments are missing the upside of it being precisely Rust, without any new semantics. If you want lisp that compiles to machine code, Common Lisp can get reasonably efficient. The purpose of bringing Rust into it is to surface Rust-specific semantics -- which many people quite like!
So I'm guessing it's sort of like Fennel, which consciously doesn't completely hide its underlying Lua runtime?
https://fennel-lang.org/
this is actually very interesting approach to syntax remixing, while keeping the ontology
[flagged]
Incorrect, and mean-spirited. Come on.
For what it's worth I thought it was a nice comment and I saw no sign of AI in it