Comment by frb

9 days ago

IMHO shrugging it off as “superficially plausible text” is the extreme to the other side.

We’re past plausible text since GPT-2 and it’s undeniable that the technology is making waves right now and is having an impact.

As you can’t judge the impact of the Industrial Revolution by the first steam engines, you can’t dismiss the impact the technology is having right now.

In writing code, yes. But has there been an actual positive impact in other fields?

  • No. It ruins art, ruins music, ruins communication and on and on. It's cancerous with respect to anything related to art or cultural value.

  • Medicine?

    There was recently an article shared around here that an LLM diagnosed ER patients more accurately than doctors.

    Looking beyond LLMs image analysis to detect cancer and other diseases.

    Like in coding, AI can and should be a useful tool for the human who decides and is ultimately responsible.

    • If you read more than the headline it was not how doctors diagnose patients in an ER(small text only description of symptoms).

  • “In producing textiles but has there been actual positive impact in other sectors?” I’m sure the Industrial Revolution didn’t just happen all at once, it started somewhere and crept.

  • support of all kind (including voice), marketing, real-estate, financial... yes, a ton of fields are being very impacted right now but right now doesn't even matter, what matter is what we know it will reach as theory will become practice.

    • Generally, people don't care about "fields being impacted", and the students certainly don't. People care about the impact certain technology has on their daily lives, on their welfare and the ability to pay off their mortgage and provide a decent life for their children.

      The AI as it is today isn't really doing any of those things. At most, it's a sort of reliable replacement fot Google Search. Worden ehen, it's being presented as threat to all those things the people care about.