Comment by freetime2

> Have you been on the Internet at all in the last 2 decades? Do you seriously think that even if that kind of advertising vector isn't being paid for today, it won't be tomorrow?

Conflicts of interest are nothing new - dating back to newspapers, radio, television, and search engines. And yet in all of these mediums companies have figured out how to display sponsored content while still maintaining the trust of their users. AI companies have a similar vested interest in maintaining their users’ trust (not to mention adherence to current and future advertising regulations).

> Do we really have to litigate this?

Yes, if you are going to assume the worst possible outcome, then you must also explain why other outcomes - such as clearly distinguishing sponsored content from “informational” content - are not possible.

> Beyond that, the issue is still that you are not going to get complete market coverage.

Which non-AI information sources promise complete market coverage?

> You would be better off spending the time to understand the market, what differentiates the products in it, and how to think about the parameters involved

I agree this should be the end goal in decision making. And in my experience AI can be a useful tool to get there.

> all things that are being just abstracted away by asking a Chatbot for a list of requirements.

ChatGPT doesn’t just give a list of results without context. It’s also quite good about justifying why it gives the results that it does. And you are free to ask follow-up questions, and fact check the responses against other sources.

I treat it the same as basically any other information source that I come across. I fully understand that it is not perfect. But that doesn’t mean that it’s not useful.