Comment by sokka_h2otribe
1 day ago
Writing quality was distracting. Very breathey. Hard to understand if I was getting important information or not -- but it's ok, some people will defend this style.
1 day ago
Writing quality was distracting. Very breathey. Hard to understand if I was getting important information or not -- but it's ok, some people will defend this style.
You can look at a histogram of number of words per sentence, and you'll find immediately that it's written by an AI.
The only time I want to read something written by AI is when I am interacting with an LLM directly. I don’t know who these people are that think others want to read their slop. Even if the content is good, I can’t stand reading it.
lol, I copied the first 4 paragraphs into gptzero and it confirms, 100% ai generated. Which makes this submission against HN guidelines...
It's written like a LinkedIn post, with the TED Talk pauses for effect. I've come to filter out anything written in that style.
It's written by an AI. That's why it's a bit shit.
I'd put my money on "edited by an AI". Some of it feels info-dense enough to be a person.