Comment by kbolino

5 hours ago

I've been intrigued by the possibility of statically compiled games for Linux but I don't think they're the more compatible option. For typical games and players, the game needs to cooperate and interact with the window system. Even setting aside the X11 vs. Wayland issue, AFAIK neither have promised to maintain compatibility for static binaries.

2 comments

kbolino

Reply
skydhash  3 hours ago

Aren’t both wayland and X11 protocols? Sure there are toolkits, but they’re not hard requirements (based on the little I know).

  • kbolino  1 hour ago

    I also don't know a whole lot, but yes, they both are ultimately implemented as families of client-server protocols over Unix domain sockets (X11 also supports TCP). Inasmuch as you are content with targeting a single version-set of those protocols, then that is sufficient to enable static compilation.

    However, the real issue I'm getting at is the ability to run the same statically compiled binary many years later. That requires a dedication to compatibility (in this case, protocol compatibility). X11 was a bit all over the place on this, though it is probably stable enough now by dint of not getting much attention anymore. It seems like Wayland takes protocol compatibility pretty seriously [1] but there's an important caveat:

      [W]hen a protocol transitions from unstable to stable, one last breaking change is permitted.
  [ ... ]
  Note that many useful protocols are still unstable at the time of writing.

    Though this itself may be out of date by now (I can't find a date of authorship in that book).

    [1]: https://wayland-book.com/protocol-design/design-patterns.htm...