Comment by stalfosknight 3 days ago I really wonder how much time and effort people think they are saving by avoiding the Shift key. 8 comments stalfosknight Reply kjs3 3 days ago It's not about saving time. It's a poseur thing. 0123456789ABCDE 2 days ago > …poseurs…and what is this then? llbbdd 3 days ago It's formal vs. informal register; both of you are doing a version of the classic "Can I go to the bathroom?" / "I don't know, can you?" bit kjs3 2 days ago No it's not and no we're not. It's a trite, annoying, contrived affect. No true scottsman does it. 4 replies →
kjs3 3 days ago It's not about saving time. It's a poseur thing. 0123456789ABCDE 2 days ago > …poseurs…and what is this then? llbbdd 3 days ago It's formal vs. informal register; both of you are doing a version of the classic "Can I go to the bathroom?" / "I don't know, can you?" bit kjs3 2 days ago No it's not and no we're not. It's a trite, annoying, contrived affect. No true scottsman does it. 4 replies →
llbbdd 3 days ago It's formal vs. informal register; both of you are doing a version of the classic "Can I go to the bathroom?" / "I don't know, can you?" bit kjs3 2 days ago No it's not and no we're not. It's a trite, annoying, contrived affect. No true scottsman does it. 4 replies →
kjs3 2 days ago No it's not and no we're not. It's a trite, annoying, contrived affect. No true scottsman does it. 4 replies →
It's not about saving time. It's a poseur thing.
> …poseurs…
and what is this then?
It's formal vs. informal register; both of you are doing a version of the classic "Can I go to the bathroom?" / "I don't know, can you?" bit
No it's not and no we're not. It's a trite, annoying, contrived affect. No true scottsman does it.
4 replies →