Comment by jeffbee 7 hours ago I doubt you can prove that. 2 comments jeffbee Reply energy123 6 hours ago Do you think the attacker or defender will have been the overall beneficiary of LLMs when we look back in 5 years from now? jeffbee 6 hours ago I don't know, I think it will mostly come down to which side has better recruiting. In other words, all things being equal, I think it's a wash. It was the second part of your claim that I don't think can be proven.
energy123 6 hours ago Do you think the attacker or defender will have been the overall beneficiary of LLMs when we look back in 5 years from now? jeffbee 6 hours ago I don't know, I think it will mostly come down to which side has better recruiting. In other words, all things being equal, I think it's a wash. It was the second part of your claim that I don't think can be proven.
jeffbee 6 hours ago I don't know, I think it will mostly come down to which side has better recruiting. In other words, all things being equal, I think it's a wash. It was the second part of your claim that I don't think can be proven.
Do you think the attacker or defender will have been the overall beneficiary of LLMs when we look back in 5 years from now?
I don't know, I think it will mostly come down to which side has better recruiting. In other words, all things being equal, I think it's a wash. It was the second part of your claim that I don't think can be proven.