Rather you're a bad comprehender of what words mean.
What they said was what it looks like, and in fact it does look exactly like what they said.
The comment contains the exact same content and value as a bot comment. It doesn't matter who or what wrote it, the critique of the comment itself holds water.
So the critique was not "a bot wrote this" it was "either a bot wrote this, or a human wrote a comment that is no better than the ones bots write".
You know what else a human might do even worse than a bot a lot of times? A bot would read this and apologize for getting something so wrong.
"I didn't expect to understand this topic like with most articles about weird shit on Wikipedia but wow, that animation actually brought the DC of grokking that knowledge within the reach of my INT modifier! Like super cool, dude!"
How's this? Is it more human-like now?
(your feedback may be used to improve the model for everyone)
And the music that goes along with it is pretty great, too.
Apparently done by this artist? https://laoexperiment.bandcamp.com/album/quantum-magnet-soun...
For real, not what I expect to come across when checking out more in-the-weeds topics. Super accessible, even for a layman like me.
Not a big fan of the music though, sounded like I left another video playing in the background at points.
this looks like those bot comments on youtube videos.
Maybe you're a bad judge of what comments are botted?
I didn't say it was a bot comment, I said it looks like a bot comment. Many of the shorts Youtube shows me are almost identical to that message.
3 replies →
Rather you're a bad comprehender of what words mean.
What they said was what it looks like, and in fact it does look exactly like what they said.
The comment contains the exact same content and value as a bot comment. It doesn't matter who or what wrote it, the critique of the comment itself holds water.
So the critique was not "a bot wrote this" it was "either a bot wrote this, or a human wrote a comment that is no better than the ones bots write".
You know what else a human might do even worse than a bot a lot of times? A bot would read this and apologize for getting something so wrong.
4 replies →
"I didn't expect to understand this topic like with most articles about weird shit on Wikipedia but wow, that animation actually brought the DC of grokking that knowledge within the reach of my INT modifier! Like super cool, dude!"
How's this? Is it more human-like now?
(your feedback may be used to improve the model for everyone)