Comment by ikeboy 3 hours ago As I mentioned elsewhere, neither currently apply because due process of law was followed. 6 comments ikeboy Reply ceejayoz 3 hours ago How can a deliberate blatant violation of the First Amendment be "due process of law"? ikeboy 3 hours ago Look up the elements of false imprisonment.When there's a warrant, even if wrongly granted, the arrest and imprisonment is considered lawful. ceejayoz 3 hours ago No, it isn't.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus 3 replies →
ceejayoz 3 hours ago How can a deliberate blatant violation of the First Amendment be "due process of law"? ikeboy 3 hours ago Look up the elements of false imprisonment.When there's a warrant, even if wrongly granted, the arrest and imprisonment is considered lawful. ceejayoz 3 hours ago No, it isn't.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus 3 replies →
ikeboy 3 hours ago Look up the elements of false imprisonment.When there's a warrant, even if wrongly granted, the arrest and imprisonment is considered lawful. ceejayoz 3 hours ago No, it isn't.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus 3 replies →
How can a deliberate blatant violation of the First Amendment be "due process of law"?
Look up the elements of false imprisonment.
When there's a warrant, even if wrongly granted, the arrest and imprisonment is considered lawful.
No, it isn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus
3 replies →